For a non-consensual surveillance order, who usually provides the final approval?

The final approval for a non-consensual surveillance order is typically required from a Superior Court Judge. This essential step is in place to ensure that legal standards are met and that the rights of individuals are protected while balancing law enforcement’s need to gather evidence for investigations. The judicial oversight provided by a Superior Court Judge is crucial as it adds a layer of accountability and impartiality to the surveillance process.

Prosecutors, police chiefs, and district attorneys play important roles in the inquiry and may initiate the request for surveillance based on evidence and investigative necessity. However, it is ultimately the Superior Court Judge who has the authority to grant or deny the order, reflecting the legal sovereignty of the judicial system in matters of individual privacy rights versus public safety.